Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip Before and after Roe vs. Wade: How Texans’ abortion access has fluctuated over the years ]
29 document(s) related
Texas Bills & Amendments: 8
Misc. items: 21
| Texas Bills / Amendments | Caption | Clips |
|---|---|---|
| 89th Regular Session | ||
| SB 31 | Relating to exceptions to otherwise prohibited abortions based on a physician's reasonable medical judgment. | 50 |
| 88th Regular Session | ||
| HB 3058 | Relating to the provision of certain medical treatment to a pregnant woman by a physician or health care provider. | 16 |
| 87th Regular Session | ||
| HB 1280 | Relating to prohibition of abortion; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense. | 273 |
| SB 8 | Relating to abortion, including abortions after detection of an unborn child's heartbeat; authorizing a private civil right of action. | 941 |
| 83rd 2nd Called Session | ||
| HB 2 | Relating to the regulation of abortion procedures, providers, and facilities; providing penalties. | 760 |
| 82nd Regular Session | ||
| HB 15 | Relating to informed consent to an abortion. | 299 |
| 79th Regular Session | ||
| SB 419 | Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, Texas State Board of Physician Assistant Examiners, and Texas State Board of Acupuncture Examiners and the regulation of health care professions regulated by those state agencies; providing administrative penalties. | 126 |
| 78th Regular Session | ||
| HB 15 | Relating to regulation of abortion; creating an offense | 160 |
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Defendant's notice of accelerated interlocutory appeal (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, blocking temporary injunction against Texas abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Original petition (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, seeking declaratory judgment and application for a permanent injunction surrounding meaning to Texas's abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Plaintiff's second amended verified petition for declaratory judgement and application for temporary and permanent injunction (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, addition of further plaintiffs, Texas abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Plaintiffs' first amended verified petition for declaratory judgment and application for temporary and permanent injunction (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, asking for declaratory judgment and application for a permanent injunction surrounding meaning to Texas's abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al., v. State of Texas, et al.; Temporary injunction order (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, enforcement of Texas abortion bans in connection with 'emergent medical condition' temporarily suspended; injunction blocking enforcement of 1925 abortion ban, art. 4512.1 et seq.). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
In re state of Texas, et al.; Petition for writ of mandamus and relators' emergency motion for temporary relief (No. 23-0994, whether the district court abused its discretion in issuing the temporary restraining order prohibiting the enforcement of Texas abortion statutes, Kate Cox). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
In re State of Texas, et al; Response to petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief (No. 23-0994, urging the court to deny Attorney General Ken Paxton's petition for writ of mandamus, Kate Cox). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Kate Cox et al. v. State of Texas et al.; Defendants' plea to the jurisdiction and response to plaintiffs' application for temporary restraining order (No. D-1-GN-23-008611, request for dismissal of plaintiff's application for temporary restraining order). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Kate Cox et al. v. State of Texas et al.; Order, on petition for writ of mandamus (No. 23-0994 in relation to cause no. D-1-GN-23-008611, pauses temporary restraining order while court deliberates). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Kate Cox et al. v. State of Texas et al.; Plaintiff's original verified petition for declaratory judgment and application for temporary restraining order and permanent injunction (No. D-1-GN-23-008611, request for immediate relief to obtain abortion). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Kate Cox et al. v. State of Texas et al.; Temporary restraining order (No. D-1-GN-23-008611, approval granted for immediate relief to obtain abortion). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief amici curiae on behalf of New York et al. in support of appellees (No. 23-0629, requesting to vacate district court's temporary injunction, signed by twenty states and one district). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief amicus curiae on behalf of members of the Texas State Legislature in support of defendants (No. 23-0629, arguing abortion restrictions should be decided by the Legislature; drafted by Texas Alliance for Life Trust Fund, signed by 10 senators and 80 representatives). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief for amici curiae Bumble Inc. and other businesses and businesspeople in support of appellees (No. 23-0629, affirming bipartisan businesses agree legal restrictions on reproductive health care are bad for business). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief for the states of New York, California, Arizona, et al., as amici curiae in support of appellees (No. 23-0629, affirming 'The district court appropriately granted and tailored the temporary injunction to protect the interests of Texas residents and amici's residents who may temporarily be in Texas.'). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Opinion and concurring opinions (No. 23-0629, vacating the trial court's order; asserting that doctors who denied defendants' abortions for fear of civil penalties or criminal prosecution were “simply wrong in that legal assessment'; abortion exemptions). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Plaintiffs-Appellees' response brief (No. 23-0629, seeking clarification of Texas's medical exception to its abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Judgment (No. 19-1392, overturn of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Jane Roe v. Henry Wade; Opinion (No. 70-18, legalizing abortion). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Robert P. Casey; Opinion (Nos. 91-744 and 91-902, upholding some abortion restrictions as constitutional and prohibiting a spousal notice requirement, health regulations that place a 'substantial obstacle' are forbidden). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
|
Other
|
Clips |
|
Proposed rules §165.7, concerning exceptions to abortion ban, §165.8, concerning abortion ban exception performance and documentation, and §165.9, concerning complaints regarding abortions performed. (Link Type: Agency Document) | ||