Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip Trial in federal court case over Rio Grande buoys is postponed until November ]
17 document(s) related
Misc. items: 17
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Plaintiff's opposed motion for preliminary injunction (No. 1:23-cv-00853, seeking an order to prevent more floating buoys from being deployed in the Rio Grande, Operation Lone Star, not including exhibits). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott and State of Texas; Per curiam opinion (No. 23-50632, case shall be reheard en banc and prior December 1, 2023 panel opinion is vacated) (buoy border barrier; Operation Lone Star). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott and State of Texas; Published opinion (No. 23-50632, allowing the buoy chain to remain in the river pending a federal court trial, reversing previous per curiam opinion) (Rio Grande buoy border barrier; Operation Lone Star). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott et al.; Order granting plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (No. 1:23-cv-00853-DAE, prohibiting defendants from building new, or placing additional buoys, blockades, or other structures in the Rio Grande; by September 15, 2023, defendants shall reposition, at defendants' expense, all materials composing the floating barrier to the bank of the Rio Grande, on the Texas side of the river). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott et al.; Plaintiff United States' notice of new facts (No. 1:23-cv-00853-DAE, observation of in-water construction to move the floating buoy barrier in the Rio Grande). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott et al.; Plaintiff United States' reply in support of motion for preliminary injunction (No. 1:23-cv-00853-DAE, arguing the U.S. is entitled to a preliminary injunction because its argument has merit)(floating buoys in the Rio Grande, Operation Lone Star). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Brief of United States Representatives Jodey C. Arrington, et al as Amici Curiae in Opposition to Plaintiff United States' opposed motion for Preliminary Injunction (No. 1:23-cv-00853, support of Rio Grande buoys, Rivers and Harbors Act only applies if 'river is wide and deep enough for shipping.') (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Complaint (No. 1:23-cv-00853, floating buoy barrier in the Rio Grande was built without the federal authorization that is legally required under the Rivers and Harbors Act, Operation Lone Star, includes exhibits). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Defendants' memorandum in opposition to plaintiff United States' motion for preliminary injunction (No. 1:23-cv-00853, arguing the U.S. is not entitled to a preliminary injunction because it is unlikely to succeed in the merits, floating buoys in the Rio Grande, Operation Lone Star; including exhibits). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Defendants' motion to conduct limited expedited discovery (No. 1:23-cv-00853-DII, alleging that Texas is reducing the severe risks of human trafficking, fentanyl and cartel violence by erecting a floating buoy barrier to redirect migrants to ports of entry at bridges; arguing that this case should be consolidated with EPI's Canoe & Kayak Team, LLC and Jessie F. Fuentes v. State of Texas, et al (No. _____)). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Opinion and dissenting opinion (No. 23-50632, dissolving the administrative stay and affirming the district court's preliminary injunction; buoy border barrier; Operation Lone Star). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Plaintiff United States' notice of second survey by the International Boundary and Water Commission (No. 1:23-cv-00853-DAE, floating buoys are now on the Texas side of the Rio Grande; includes Exhibit #1, declaration of Jennifer T. Pena). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Plaintiff United States' notice of survey by the International Boundary and Water Commission (No. 1:23-cv-00853, supplemental declaration including survey data that finds the majority of the floating buoy barrier in the Rio Grande is located within the territory of Mexico, Operation Lone Star). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States v. Greg Abbott; Brief of amici curiae Kansas, et al., in support of appellants (No. 23-50632, supporting Texas' analysis of the merits, buoy border barrier, Operation Lone Star). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States v. Greg Abbott; Defendants’ opposed emergency motion to stay preliminary injunction pending appeal and for an administrative stay (No. 23-50632, requesting a stay on lower court order pending appeal, due to time constraints; removal of buoy barrier wall, Rio Grande). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States v. Greg Abbott; United States' opposition to appellants' motion for a temporary administrative stay (No. 23-50632, allowing a stay would diminish Texas's incentive to coordinate with the Army Corps of Engineers; removal of buoy barrier wall, Rio Grande). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
|
Texas Governor Materials
|
Clips |
|
Letter to President Joseph R. Biden re: Justice Department suit over buoys in Rio Grande River at Eagle Pass ("I have asserted Texas's 'sovereign interest in protecting [her] borders.') (Link Type: Letter) | ||