HBA-TYH C.S.H.B. 3836 76(R)BILL ANALYSIS


Office of House Bill AnalysisC.S.H.B. 3836
By: Truitt
Urban Affairs
4/30/1999
Committee Report (Substituted)



BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

On April 8, 1999, in the case of Scott Bradley v. The State of Texas on the
Relation of Dale White, the Supreme Court of Texas ruled in favor of
Bradley, a mayor who was unlawfully removed from office through Section
21.002(f), Local Government Code.   Some officials in small towns have used
this statute to put colleagues on trial, using vague procedures and
allowing themselves to act as judges, jury, and witnesses.  C.S.H.B. 3836
clarifies the removal proceedings for members of the governing body of a
general-law municipality. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does
not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, department, agency, or institution. 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

SECTION 1. Amends Chapter 21, Local Government Code, by designating Section
21.001 as Subchapter A and adding a heading, as follows: 

SUBCHAPTER A.  GENERAL PROVISIONS

SECTION 2.  Amends Chapter 21, Local Government Code, by adding Subchapter
B, as follows: 

SUBCHAPTER B.  REMOVAL OF MEMBER OF GOVERNING 
BODY OF GENERAL-LAW MUNICIPALITY

Sec. 21.021.  APPLICABILITY.  Provides that this subchapter applies only to
a general-law municipality. 

Sec. 21.022.  DEFINITIONS.  Defines "district attorney," "incompetency,"
"officer," and "official misconduct." 

Sec. 21.023.  REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.  Authorizes the district judge to remove
an officer of the municipality from office. 

Sec. 21.024.  NO REMOVAL BEFORE ACTION.  Prohibits an officer from being
removed for an act the officer committed before election to office. 

Sec. 21.025.  GENERAL GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL.  Authorizes an officer to be
removed from office for incompetency, official misconduct, or intoxication
on or off duty caused by drinking an alcoholic beverage.  Provides that
intoxication is not a ground for removal if it appears at the trial that
the intoxication was caused by drinking an alcoholic beverage on the
direction and prescription of a licensed physician practicing in this
state. 

Sec. 21.026.  PETITION FOR REMOVAL.  Provides that a proceeding for the
removal of an officer is begun by filing a written petition for removal in
a district court in which the officer resides.  Authorizes any resident of
the municipality who has lived for at least six months in the municipality
and who is not currently under indictment in the county in which  the
municipality is located to file the petition.  Provides that at least one
of the parties who files the petition must swear to it at or before the
filing.  Provides that the petition must be addressed to the district judge
of the court in which it is filed, must specify the grounds alleged for the
removal of the officer in plain and intelligible language, and must cite
the time and place of the occurrence of each act alleged as a ground for
removal with as much certainty as the nature of the case permits. 

Sec. 21.027.  CITATION OF OFFICER.  (a)  Requires the person filing the
petition to apply to the district judge in writing for an order requiring a
citation and a certified copy of the petition to be served on the officer. 

(b)  Prohibits action, if the application for the order is made during the
term of the court, from being taken on the petition until the order is
granted and entered in the minutes of the court.  Requires the judge, if
the application is made during the vacation of the court, to indicate on
the petition the action taken and to have the action entered in the minutes
of the court at the next term. 

(c)  Requires the petition, if the judge refuses to issue te order for
citation, to be dismissed at the cost of the person filing the petition.
Prohibits the person from taking an appeal from the judge's decision or
applying for a writ of mandamus.  Requires the clerk, if the judge grants
the order for citation, to issue the citation with a certified copy of the
petition.  Requires the judge to require the person filing the petition to
post security for costs in the manner provided for other cases. 

(d)  Requires the citation to order the officer to appear and answer the
petition on a date, fixed by the judge, after the fifth day after the date
the citation is served.  Provides that the time is computed as is in other
suits.  Requires disposition of this action by the district court to take
precedence over other civil matters on the court's docket. 

Sec. 21.028.  BOND.  (a)  Requires the judge to require the person filing
the petition to execute a bond, with at least two good and sufficient
sureties, in an amount fixed by the judge and conditioned as required by
the judge.  Requires the bond to be used to pay damages and costs to the
officer if the grounds for removal are found at trial to be insufficient or
untrue.  Provides that the officer must serve written notice on the person
who filed the petition and that person's bondsman within 90 days of the
execution of the bond stating that the officer intends to hold them liable
on the bond and stating the grounds for that liability. 

(b)  Requires the person filing the petition, if the final judgment
establishes the officer's right to the office, to pay the officer an amount
determined by the judge as appropriate to compensate the officer for the
damages suffered as a result of the removal action. 

Sec. 21.029.  TRIAL.  Requires an officer to have the right to trial by
jury.  Requires the trial for the removal of an officer and the proceedings
connected with the trial to be conducted as much as possible in accordance
with the rules and practice of the court in other civil cases, in the name
of the State of Texas, and on the relation of the person filing the
petition. Prohibits the judge, in a removal case, from submitting special
issues to the jury.  Requires the judge, under a proper charge applicable
to the facts of the case, to instruct the jury to find from the evidence
whether the grounds for removal alleged in the petition are true.  Requires
the jury, if the petition alleges more than one ground for removal, to
indicate in the verdict which grounds are sustained by the evidence and
which are not sustained.  Requires the district attorney to represent the
state in a proceeding for the removal of an officer. 

Sec. 21.030.  APPEAL.  Authorizes either party to a removal action to
appeal the final judgment to the court of appeals in the manner provided
for other civil cases.  Provides that the officer is not required to post
an appeal bond but may be required to post a bond for costs.  Provides that
an appeal of a removal action takes precedence over the ordinary business
of the court of appeals, requires the appeal to be decided with all
convenient dispatch.  Requires the court of appeals, if the trial court
judgment is not set aside or  suspended, to issue its mandate in the case
not later than the fifth day after the date the court renders its judgment. 

Sec. 21.031.  REMOVAL BY CRIMINAL CONVICTION.  Provides that the conviction
of an officer by a petit jury for any felony or for a misdemeanor involving
official misconduct operates as an immediate removal from office.  Requires
the court rendering judgment in the case to include in the judgment an
order removing the officer.  Provides that if the removed officer appeals
the judgment, the appeal supersedes the order of removal unless the court
that renders the judgment finds that it is in the public interest to
suspend the removed officer pending the appeal.  Requires the court, if the
court finds that the public interest requires suspension, to suspend the
removed officer. 

Sec. 21.032.  REELECTION PROHIBITED FOR CERTAIN PERIOD.  Provides that an
officer removed is not eligible for reelection to the same office before
the second anniversary of the date of the removal.   

SECTION 3.  Repealer: Section 21.002 (Removal of Mayor or Alderman in
General-Law Municipality), Local Government Code. 

SECTION 4.  Makes application of this Act prospective.

SECTION 5.  Effective date: September 1, 1999.

SECTION 6.  Emergency clause.

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

The substitute modifies the original bill by changing the caption from
"relating to requiring a recall election to remove a member of the
governing body of a general-law municipality" to "relating to the removal
of a member of the governing body of a general-law municipality." 

The substitute modifies the original bill by removing SECTION 1 (relating
to the procedures in the recall of a member of the governing body of the
municipality in a recall election) of the original bill. 

The substitute modifies the original bill by adding new SECTIONS 1, 2, 3,
4, and 5.  For a complete analysis of the new sections please see the
Section-by-Section Analysis portion of this document. 

The substitute modifies the original bill by redesignating SECTION 2
(emergency clause) of the original bill to SECTION 6 and by changing the
long emergency clause of the original bill into a short emergency clause in
the substitute.