HBA-ATS C.S.H.B. 3450 76(R)BILL ANALYSIS


Office of House Bill AnalysisC.S.H.B. 3450
By: Hilderbran
Civil Practices
4/26/1999
Committee Report (Substituted)



BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

Section 242.252 (Election of Arbitration), Health and Safety Code,
authorizes the Texas Department of Human Services to elect arbitration in a
dispute with a licensed nursing or convalescent home or related institution
that relates to renewal of a license, suspension or revocation of a
license, assessment of a civil penalty, assessment of a monetary penalty
under, or assessment of a penalty. An arbitration order is binding and
final on all parties, except for a right to appeal under Section 242.267
(Court Vacating Order).  If the court finds that the order was procured by
corruption, fraud, or misrepresentation, the decision of the arbitrator was
arbitrary or capricious and against the weight of the evidence or the order
exceeded the jurisdiction of the arbitrator, then the court is required to
vacate the order.  Although the statute provides a mechanism for vacating
an order, it fails to provide a legal mechanism to enforce an order.
Consequently, a party that has an order rendered against it may choose not
to abide the order. 

C.S.H.B. 3450 requires the district court in which a suit to vacate an
arbitrator's order has been filed, upon application of a party, to enter a
judgment in conformity with the arbitration award, unless, within the time
limits prescribed by Section 242.267(d)(1) (Court Vacating Order) a motion
is made to the court to vacate the order under Section 242.267.  For this
requirement to be applicable, the suit must be for the assessment of a
civil penalty under Section 242.065 (Civil Penalty) in which binding
arbitration has been elected under Subchapter J (Arbitration of Certain
Disputes) as an alternative to the judicial proceeding.  However, the
court's requirement to enter a judgment in conformity with the arbitration
order does not affect the right of a party to make a motion to the court or
initiate a proceeding in court as provided by law to vacate the
arbitrator's order or to vacate a judgment of the court entered in
accordance with the arbitrator's order. 

Under this bill, the court's judgment is enforceable in the same manner as
any other judgment of the court, and the court is authorized to award costs
for an application to vacate and for any proceedings held after the
application is made. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does
not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, department, agency, or institution. 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

SECTION 1.  Amends Subchapter J, Chapter 242, Health and Safety Code, by
adding Section 242.269, as follows: 

Sec. 242.269.  ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN ARBITRATION ORDERS.  (a) Provides
that this section applies only to a suit for the assessment of a civil
penalty under Section 242.065 (Civil Penalty) in which binding arbitration
has been elected under Subchapter J (Arbitration of Certain Disputes) as an
alternative to the judicial proceeding.  

(b) Requires the district court in which a suit to vacate an arbitrator's
order has been filed, upon application of a party, to enter a judgment in
conformity with the arbitration award, unless, within the time limits
prescribed by Section 242.267(d)(1) (Court Vacating Order) a motion is made
to the court to vacate the order under Section 242.267. 
 
(c) Provides that this judgment is enforceable in the same manner as any
other judgment of the court.  Authorizes the court to award costs for an
application made under Subsection (b) and for any proceedings held after
the application is made. 

(d) Provides that Subsection (b) does not affect the right of a party, in
accordance with Section 242.267 and within the time limit prescribed by
Section 242.267(d)(2), if applicable, to make a motion to the court or
initiate a proceeding in court as provided by law to vacate the
arbitrator's order or to vacate a judgment of the court entered in
accordance with the arbitrator's order. 

SECTION 2.Effective date: September 1, 1999.
  Makes application of this Act prospective.

SECTION 3.Emergency clause.

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

C.S.H.B. 3450 differs from the original bill in the caption by providing
that this Act relates to the collection of civil penalties assessed against
a convalescent or nursing home or related institution, rather than assessed
under Chapter 242 (Convalescent and Nursing Homes and Related
Institutions), Health and Safety Code, and by making a nonsubstantive
change. 

C.S.H.B. 3450 differs from the original bill in SECTION 1 by specifying
that the proposed addition of Section 242.269, Health and Safety Code, is
in Subchapter J (Arbitration of Certain Disputes). 

The substitute also differs from the original by changing the title of
proposed Section 242.269, Health and Safety Code, from "Enforcement of
Arbitration Order" to "Enforcement of Certain Arbitration Orders." 

The substitute differs from the original by redesignating proposed Section
242.269(a) of the original to proposed Section 242.269(b).  In proposed
Section 242.269(a) of the substitute, the substitute provides that proposed
Section 242.269 applies only to a suit for the assessment of a civil
penalty under Section 242.065 (Civil Penalty) in which binding arbitration
has been elected under Subchapter J as an alternative to the judicial
proceeding. 

In redesignated Section 242.269(b), the substitute differs from the
original by requiring the district court in which a suit to vacate an
arbitrator's order has been filed, upon application of a party, to enter a
judgment in conformity with the arbitration award, unless, within the time
limits prescribed by Section 242.267(d)(1) (Court Vacating Order), rather
than within the time limits imposed under Section 242.067 (Report
Recommending Administrative Penalty), a motion is made to the court to
vacate, rather than grounds are urged for vacating, the order under Section
242.267, rather than Section 242.067. 

The substitute differs from the original by redesignating proposed Section
242.269(b) of the original to proposed Section 242.269(c).  In proposed
Section 242.269(c) of the substitute, the substitute differs from the
original by providing that a judgment under proposed Subsection (b) is
enforceable, rather than requiring its enforcement, in the same manner as
any other judgment of the court.  The substitute also specifies that
authorized costs are for an application made under Subsection (b) and for
any proceeding held after the application is made.  The original had
authorized the court to award "costs of the application and of any
subsequent proceeding thereto."  The substitute makes conforming changes.  

The substitute differs from the original bill by adding Section 242.269(d)
to provide that proposed Subsection (b) does not affect the right of a
party, in accordance with Section 242.267 and within the time limit
prescribed by Section 242.267(d)(2), if applicable, to make a motion to the
court or initiate a proceeding in court as provided by law to vacate the
arbitrator's order or to vacate a judgment of the court entered in
accordance with the arbitrator's order. 

 C.S.H.B. 3450 differs from the original bill by removing the titles of
SECTIONS 2, 3, and 4 of the original. 

C.S.H.B. 3450 differs from the original bill by incorporating SECTIONS 2
and 3 (effective date) of the original into SECTION 2 of the substitute. 

C.S.H.B. 3450 differs from the original bill by redesignating SECTION 4
(emergency clause) of the original to SECTION 3.